PFC Converter Examples¶
Power Factor Correction circuits for AC-DC conversion.
Overview¶
PFC converters shape input current to be sinusoidal, achieving: - Near-unity power factor (>0.99) - Low THD (<5%) - Regulatory compliance (IEC 61000-3-2)
Circuit Files¶
pfc_boost_ccm.ipes- CCM boost PFCpfc_boost_crm.ipes- Critical conduction modepfc_interleaved.ipes- Two-phase interleavedpfc_bridgeless.ipes- Totem-pole bridgeless
Specifications¶
Single-Phase Boost PFC¶
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Input Voltage | 85-265V AC |
| Output Voltage | 400V DC |
| Output Power | 1 kW |
| Switching Frequency | 65 kHz (CCM) |
| Inductor | 330 µH |
| Power Factor | >0.99 |
Theory¶
Boost PFC Operation¶
Input current follows rectified voltage shape: $\(i_{in}(t) = I_{pk} \cdot |\sin(\omega t)|\)$
Duty cycle varies with instantaneous voltage: $\(D(t) = 1 - \frac{|v_{in}(t)|}{V_{out}}\)$
Control Methods¶
Average Current Mode: - Current loop tracks sinusoidal reference - Excellent THD performance - Bandwidth limited by 2× line frequency
Critical Conduction Mode (CRM): - Variable frequency - Zero current turn-on - Higher peak currents
Interleaved PFC¶
Benefits: - Ripple cancellation at input - Reduced capacitor current - Smaller inductors - Distributed thermal load
Phase shift between channels: 360°/N
Bridgeless Topologies¶
Totem-Pole PFC¶
- Eliminates input bridge
- Higher efficiency (~0.5% gain)
- Requires GaN/SiC for CRM operation
- Bidirectional capable
Exercises¶
- Power Factor Measurement: Verify PF and THD
- CCM vs CRM: Compare inductor current waveforms
- Interleaving Effect: Observe ripple cancellation
- Efficiency: Compare topologies